Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-7948•United States of America v. Raymond Cherisson
06-7948Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.05.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7948
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RAYMOND CHERISSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:94-cr-00097-14-BO)
Submitted: March 28, 2007 Decided: May 17, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Cherisson, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Blaise Hamilton,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Cherisson appeals the district court’s order
denying Cherisson’s motion for leave to file out-of-time notice of
appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Cherisson v. United States, No. 5:94-cr-00097-14-BO
(E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.