Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-7915•United States of America v. Wenley McClaren
06-7915Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.04.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7915
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WENLEY MCCLAREN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,
District Judge. (3:90-cr-00007-WCB)
Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 23, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wenley McClaren, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Wenley McClaren appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for correction of an illegal sentence pursuant
to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant McClaren’s motion to
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. McClaren, No. 3:90-cr-00007-WCB
(N.D.W. Va. Oct. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.