Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-7741•Marguerite G. Brown v. Nurse Brenda
06-7741Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.04.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7741
MARGUERITE G. BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NURSE BRENDA; NURSE LIALA; DOCTOR REESE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL; RAPPAHANNOCK
REGIONAL JAIL STAFF,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:05-cv-00029-GBL)
Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marguerite G. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney,
RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Marguerite G. Brown appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v.
Doctor Reese, No. 1:05-cv-00029-GBL (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.