Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-7654•Kelvin Watford v. W.P. ROGERS, Regional Director
06-7654Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.12.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7654
KELVIN WATFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W.P. ROGERS, Regional Director; D.M. VAUGHN,
Warden; E. WILLIS, Treatment Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:06-cv-00104-GBL)
Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 22, 2006
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin Watford, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kelvin Watford appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous and
denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both
orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Watford v. Rogers, No. 1:06-cv-00104-GBL (E.D. Va. entered June 30,
2006; entered Sept. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.