Dennis Roger Vandyke v. OFFICER O’DONELL, (female) at Rutherford County Detention Center

06-7454Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.03.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7454
DENNIS ROGER VANDYKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER O’DONELL, (female) at Rutherford
County Detention Center; J. R. DAVIS, Police
Officer at Forest City Police Department;
JAMES FISH, Lieutenant at Rutherford County
Detention Center; KAY YOUNG, Sergeant at
Rutherford County Detention Center,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DAN GOOD, Sheriff of Rutherford County,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (1:05-cv-00357)
Submitted: February 26, 2007 Decided: March 27, 2007
Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Dennis Roger Vandyke, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Douglas MacLatchie,
WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina;
James Demarest Secor, III, William L. Hill, FRAZIER, FRANKLIN, HILL
& FURY, RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Roger Vandyke appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Vandyke v.
O’Donell, No. 1:05-cv-00357 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.