Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-7243•United States of America v. Gustav W. Kloszewski, a/k/a Jay Denmark
06-7243Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.11.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7243
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GUSTAV W. KLOSZEWSKI, a/k/a Jay Denmark,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (5:91-cr-00057; 5:92-cr-00023;
5:95-cr-00008; 5:95-cr-00021)
Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 16, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gustav W. Kloszewski, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gustav W. Kloszewski appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Kloszewski, Nos. 5:91-cr-00057; 5:92-cr-00023;
5:95-cr-00008; 5:95-cr-00021 (W.D.N.C. May 31, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.