Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-7224•Chad Tyrone Kincaid v. United States Marshal Service
06-7224Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.04.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7224
CHAD TYRONE KINCAID,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; DOCTOR
ABERNATHY; GARY CLARK, Sheriff; SERGEANTS ON
DUTY ON SPECIFIC DATES, CALDWELL COUNTY, NC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00065)
Submitted: March 12, 2007 Decided: April 5, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chad Tyrone Kincaid, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Chad Tyrone Kincaid appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Kincaid v. U.S. Marshal Serv., No. 5:06-
cv-00065 (W.D.N.C. June 14, 2006). We also deny Kincaid’s motions
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.