Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-7128•Gerald Davis Fuller v. Washington County Hospital
06-7128Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.11.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7128
GERALD DAVIS FULLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WASHINGTON COUNTY HOSPITAL; MARK MARTIN,
Captain; RODERICK R. SOWERS, Warden; UNKNOWN
D.O.C. AGENT OR EMPLOYEE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:05-cv-02333-WMN)
Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 30, 2006
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Davis Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. James Sunderland Aist,
ANDERSON, COE & KING, Baltimore, Maryland, Phillip Michael Pickus,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Fuller’s motion for injunction and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Fuller v. Washington County Hosp.,
No. 1:05-cv-02333-WMN (D. Md. May 24, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.