Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-7091•United States of America v. Lance Bishop Steglich, a/k/a Robert Rock
06-7091Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit08.01.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7091
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LANCE BISHOP STEGLICH, a/k/a Robert Rock,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District
Judge. (3:00-cr-00063-JHM; 7:06-cv-00055-JPJ)
Submitted: December 20, 2006 Decided: January 8, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lance Bishop Steglich, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lance Bishop Steglich appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his pleading captioned as “An
Independent Action Motion for Reconsideration Writ of Habeas
Corpus.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Steglich, Nos. 3:00-cr-00063-JHM; 7:06-cv-
00055-JPJ (W.D. Va. May 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.