Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-6920•Clarence Ricks v. Helen F. Fahey
06-6920Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.10.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6920
CLARENCE RICKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HELEN F. FAHEY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00153-RLW)
Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 20, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Ricks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Ricks appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply
with the court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Ricks v. Lahey, No. 3:06-cv-00153-RLW
(E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.