Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-6794•Lawrence Fearon v. Hagerstown Trust Corporation
06-6794Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.10.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6794
LAWRENCE FEARON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HAGERSTOWN TRUST CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge
(8:05-cv-00921-AW)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 10, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Fearon, Appellant Pro Se. William Joseph Carter, Michael
J. Sepanik, CARR MALONEY, P.C., Washington, D.C.; Alice Sung Hyon
Chong, BROWN & SHEEHAN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Fearon appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Fearon v. Hagerstown Trust Corp., No. 8:05-cv-
00921-AW (D. Md. Feb. 23 & Apr. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.