Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-6653•Ron Tearia Nicholas v. JONATHAN E. OZMINT, SCDC Director
06-6653Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.10.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6653
RON TEARIA NICHOLAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JONATHAN E. OZMINT, SCDC Director; HOUSER,
Chaplain at Kirkland Correctional Institution;
BERNARD MCKIE, Warden; VAUGHN JACKSON; GARY
BOYD; BETSY LYBRAND; DORIS CURENTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(8:04-cv-22471-RBH)
Submitted: October 13, 2006 Decided: October 26, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ron Tearia Nicholas, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann,
DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ron Tearia Nicholas appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Nicholas v. Ozmint,
No. 8:04-cv-22471-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.