United States of America v. Nathaniel A. Richardson, Jr

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6499
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NATHANIEL A. RICHARDSON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:96-cr-00153-RAJ-1)
Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 2, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel A. Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel A. Richardson, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. See United States v. Richardson, No.
2:96-cr-00153-RAJ-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2006); see also United
States v. Moreno, 421 F.3d 1217, 1220 (11th Cir. 2005) (holding
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), is inapplicable to
§ 3582(c)(2) motions), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1643 (2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --