United States of America v. Robert Louis Ponzini

06-6118Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.06.2006

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6118
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT LOUIS PONZINI,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:02-cr-00423-JRS)
Submitted: June 16, 2006 Decided: June 30, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Louis Ponzini, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert Louis Ponzini appeals the district court’s order
denying Ponzini’s 28 U.S.C. § 3742 (2000) motion for want of
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Ponzini, No. 3:02-cr-00423-
JRS (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.