Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-6103•Elijah Marshall, Jr v. Colie Rushton
06-6103Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.06.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6103
ELIJAH MARSHALL, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
COLIE RUSHTON; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (6:05-cv-00345-GRA)
Submitted: April 28, 2006 Decided: June 22, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elijah Marshall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Elijah Marshall, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. Marshall,
however, waived his right to appeal by failing timely to file
objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. See Wells v.
Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir. 1997). We therefore
dismiss the appeal. Id. at 200. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.