Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-2329•Eric Shane Throneburg v. Charles R. Perdue, Jr
06-2329Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.09.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2329
ERIC SHANE THRONEBURG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES R. PERDUE, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief
District Judge. (1:06-cv-00203)
Submitted: September 7, 2007 Decided: September 27, 2007
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William J. Akers, AKERS LAW OFFICE, Princeton, West Virginia, for
Appellant. Stuart A. McMillan, Diana Leigh Johnson, BOWLES, RICE,
MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Eric Shane Throneburg appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant and dismissing Throneburg’s
civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Throneburg v. Perdue, No. 1:06-cv-00203 (S.D. W.
Va. Nov. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.