Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-2319•Dennis Michael Gallipeau v. Myspace.com, an internet website
06-2319Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.02.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2319
DENNIS MICHAEL GALLIPEAU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MYSPACE.COM, an internet website; FOX
INTERACTIVE MEDIA, Parent company and owner of
Myspace.Com; JOHN DOE, Parent of a member of
Myspace.Com; JANE DOE, Parent of a member of
Myspace.Com; JANE DOE, 2,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District
Judge. (2:06-cv-00666-WDK)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 28, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Michael Gallipeau, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Michael Gallipeau seeks to appeal the district
court’s dismissal of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
Denial of in forma pauperis status is reviewed for abuse of
discretion. See Roberts v. United States Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844,
845 (1950). A review of the record indicates that the district
court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the
decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.