United States of America v. Ronald Stuart Rose, a/k/a Rahking

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6885
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RONALD STUART ROSE, a/k/a Rahking,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:03-cr-444)
Submitted: September 17, 2008 Decided: October 8, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Stuart Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Stuart Rose appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000), and his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Rose, No. 3:03-cr-444 (E.D. Va. May 16 & 29, 2008). We
deny the motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate
of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --