Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-2088•Roy T. Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics
06-2088Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.02.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2088
ROY T. COOPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NAN YA PLASTICS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:04-cv-21823-TLW)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy T. Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Pharr Pearson, Cheryl
Lynne Behymer, FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Roy T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
the employment discrimination action Cooper brought against his
former employer, Nan Ya Plastics. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. (Cooper v. Nan Ya Plastics, No.
4:04-cv-21823-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006)). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.