Gregory Wayne Alford v. Collins, 766 F.3d 841, 845-46 4th Cir. 1985

06-1931Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.02.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1931
GREGORY WAYNE ALFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:04-cv-23257-CMC)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Wayne Alford, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr.,
WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

* Alford’s failure to object to the magistrate judge’s
recommendation as to his race discrimination claims, after proper
notice of the consequences of his failure to do so, results in
waiver of this issue on review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.3d 841,
845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140
(1985).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Wayne Alford appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and district
court’s adverse grant of summary judgment on his employment
discrimination * and retaliation action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Alford
v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, No. 3:04-cv-23257-CMC
(D.S.C. July 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.