Babry Hanan v. United States of America

06-1693Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.01.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1693
BABRY HANAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (1:05-cv-01062-TSE)
Submitted: January 12, 2007 Decided: January 22, 2007
Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert A. Igbanugo, BLACKWELL IGBANUGO, PA, Minneapolis,
Minnesota, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney,
Evan Rikhye, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Babry Hanan appeals the district court’s orders denying
his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and denying his motion
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Hanan v. United States, No. 1:05-cv-01062-
TSE (E.D. Va. November 21, 2005 & May 9, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.