Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-1634•William C. Thompson v. Virginia Department of Game
06-1634Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.08.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1634
WILLIAM C. THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND INLAND
FISHERIES,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ROGER CHAFFE; DON HINCHEY; DAN HALL; MR.
WOODFIN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District
Judge. (1:05-cv-00109-jpj)
Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 29, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
William C. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. John Kenneth Byrum, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
William C. Thompson appeals the district court’s judgment
granting summary judgment to the Virginia Department of Game and
Inland Fisheries. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Thompson v. Virginia Dep’t of Game and
Inland Fisheries, No. 1:05-cv-00109-jpj (W.D. Va. May 14, 2006).
We also deny as moot Thompson’s motion to expedite the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.