Marla Crawford v. Tony Pham

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1556
MARLA CRAWFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TONY PHAM; CHRISTOPHER BULLARD; MRS. TIMMAS;
TONY RANDALL, Public Defender; SANDY
LEDBETTER; CHRISTOPHER COLLINS, Esquire; MR.
ETHERINGTON; HORACE HUNTER, Mr. Esquire; DAVID
LASSITER, Mr. Esquire,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:06-cv-00209-HEH)
Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marla Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. William Woodul Tunner, THOMPSON
& MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia; Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Christopher Collins,
Richmond, Virginia; William Kerfoot Lewis, BEALE, BALFOUR, DAVIDSON
& ETHERINGTON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Marla Crawford appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crawford v.
Pham, No. 3:06-cv-00209-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --