Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-1549•In re: Warthell B. Iles
06-1549Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.09.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1549
WARTHELL B. ILES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
MONROE ROOSEVELT PARKER, JR.,
Plaintiff,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FINANCE AUTHORITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 06-1550
In Re: WARTHELL B. ILES,
Debtor.
-----------------------------
WARTHELL B. ILES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
CENDANT MORTGAGE CORPORATION, d/b/a PHH
Mortgage Services; NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL
FINANCE AUTHORITY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Walter D. Kelley, Jr.,
District Judge. (4:04-cv-00079-WDK; 4:05-cv-00011-WDK; 03-53401-
SCD)
Submitted: September 19, 2007 Decided: September 27, 2007
Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Hope Marsh, HILL, TUCKER & MARSH, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellant. Jennifer Jo West, SPOTTS FAIN, P.C., Richmond,
Virginia; Jeffrey L. Marks, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C., Virginia
Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Warthell B. Iles appeals the district court’s orders
denying her motion to set aside a settlement agreement, dismissing
as untimely her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing
her Chapter 13 petition, and awarding attorneys’ fees and costs to
the Appellees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Iles v. N.C. Agric. Fin. Auth., Nos. 4:04-cv-
00079-WDK; 4:05-cv-00011-WDK (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 31, 2006 &
entered Apr. 3, 2006; Apr. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.