Wendell Freeman v. Richland County Probate Court

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1449
WENDELL FREEMAN; DAVID JATHNIEL FREEMAN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
RICHLAND COUNTY PROBATE COURT; AMY MCCULLOCH,
Probate Judge; JACQUELINE D. BELTON, Associate
Probate Judge; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; MARK
SANFORD, Governor; TERESA LEE CLEMENT,
Guardian Ad Litem,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(3:06-cv-00010-MBS)
Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wendell Freeman, David Jathniel Freeman, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Wendell and David Jathniel Freeman appeal the district
court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation and denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Freeman v. Richland County Probate Court, No.
3:06-cv-00010-MBS (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --