Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-1313•Henry Immanuel v. United States Department of Labor
06-1313Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.02.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1313
HENRY IMMANUEL,
Petitioner,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; THE RAILWAY
MARKET,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Administrative Review
Board. (04-062-ARB)
Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 23, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard E. Condit, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSIBILITY, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Thomas J.
McAndrew, Providence, Rhode Island, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Henry Immanuel petitions for review of the United States
Department of Labor Administrative Review Board’s Final Decision
and Order accepting the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended
Decision and Order to dismiss his complaint for being untimely
under the statutory deadline. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for the
reasons stated by the Administrative Review Board. Immanuel v.
United States Dep’t of Labor, No. 04-062-ARB (ARB Dec. 30, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.