Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-1293•Gloria Willingham v. GRAHAM BUCK, Officer
06-1293Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.07.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1293
GLORIA WILLINGHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
CARL JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
versus
GRAHAM BUCK, Officer; DOUGLAS A. CROOKE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SHERRY A. BASSETT, Officer; OFFICER BRIAN; J.
THOMAS MANGER; FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS; COUNTY OF FAIRFAX; ANTHONY
GRIFFIN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:00-cv-02053-CMH)
Submitted: June 30, 2006 Decided: July 21, 2006
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gloria Willingham, Appellant Pro Se. David John Fudala, Fairfax
Virginia; Robert Marvel Ross, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Gloria Willingham appeals the district court’s judgment
entered in favor of the Defendant in accordance with the jury
verdict in her civil rights trial. We have reviewed the record and
Willingham’s claims and find no reversible error. We find no error
with the admission of the testimony challenged by Willingham.
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.