Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
06-1006•061006.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1006
BAHMAN PAYMAN, M.D.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DR. Z. AHSAN; KHALOUCK ABDRABBO, M.D.; ATIQUE
MIRZA, M.D.; DR. ROY SHELBOURNE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief
District Judge. (CA-05-18-2)
Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Bragg, BRAGG LAW, PLC, Abingdon, Virginia, for
Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
By order entered March 31, 2005, the district court
permanently enjoined and prohibited Bahman Payman, M.D., from
filing any lawsuit against Dr. Roy Shelbourne and other named
individuals without first obtaining written leave from the court.
In November 2005, Payman sought leave from the court to file a
lawsuit against Shelbourne and others. By order entered
November 26, 2005, the court denied Payman’s request. Payman now
appeals the court’s denial, but only with respect to Shelbourne.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Payman v. Ahsan, No. CA-05-18-2 (W.D. Va. Nov. 26, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.