Robert John Moes v. JEFFREY L. BANEY, Case Manager Coordinator, CMC

05-7830Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.05.2006

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7830
ROBERT JOHN MOES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JEFFREY L. BANEY, Case Manager Coordinator,
CMC; ROBERT E. BRIGHT, Unit Manager;
STEPHEN M. DEWALT, Warden,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-05-
1148-RWT)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 19, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert John Moes, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Frederick, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert John Moes appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Moes v. Baney, No.
CA-05-1148-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.