057784.U

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7784
MICHAEL MCLEAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DANIEL L. STIENEKE; JAMES FRENCH; RANDALL LEE;
JAMES SMITH, Doctor; OFFICER PHILMON; OFFICER
PITTMAN; OFFICER PULLEN; OFFICER ROOKS;
OFFICER BRODY; OFFICER DANIELS; OFFICER PEARS;
OFFICER PETERSON; OFFICER INGRAM; OFFICER
PULLEN; OFFICER HARRIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-05-222-5-H)
Submitted: May 3, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael McLean, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael McLean appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motions to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See McLean v. Stieneke, No.
CA-05-222-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2005; filed Oct. 7, 2005 & entered
Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --