Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-7779•Eddie Ingram v. SERGEANT GRIFFIN, Shift Commander
05-7779Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.03.2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7779
EDDIE INGRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT GRIFFIN, Shift Commander;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KEPLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-05-622-2)
Submitted: February 14, 2007 Decided: March 2, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record, considered the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jones
v. Bock, Nos. 05-7058/05-7142, 2007 WL 135890 (2007), and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Ingram v. Griffin, No. CA-05-622-2 (E.D. Va.
Oct. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.