Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-7622•Phillip Small v. Streater
05-7622Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.01.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7622
PHILLIP SMALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JONATHAN BREEDLOVE; DANELLE HURDLE; KENRICK
WILLIAMS,
Plaintiffs,
versus
STREATER,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
RICK JACKSON; TERRY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-193-3)
Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 26, 2006
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Small, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Small appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to
exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Small v. Streater, CA-04-193-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.