Ronald D. Long, Sr v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 344-45 4th Cir. 2005 . - 2 - PER CURIAM: Ronald…

05-7518Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.03.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7518
RONALD D. LONG, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE M. HINKLE, Chief, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-05-374-GBL)
Submitted: February 21, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Long, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

*This order is a final, appealable order over which we have
jurisdiction. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342,
344-45 (4th Cir. 2005).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ronald D. Long, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his action filed under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2000), * and the order denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Long v. Hinkle, No. CA-05-374-GBL (E.D. Va.
June 20, 2005; filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005). We
deny Long’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.