Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-7516•William M. Finn v. Lieutenant Spiker
05-7516Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.03.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7516
WILLIAM M. FINN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT SPIKER; SERGEANT HICKS; LIEUTENANT
MOORE; CAPTAIN D. FLIPPEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-542-3)
Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 2, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William M. Finn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
William M. Finn appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for
failure to comply with a court order regarding filing fees. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Finn v. Spiker, No. CA-05-542-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2005). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.