Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-7495•Juan Valdez v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . - 2 - PER…
05-7495Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.03.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7495
JUAN VALDEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARRELL WATTS;
HARLEY G. LAPPIN; BOBBY SHEARIN; MICHAEL R.
MUIR; JEFFREY BANEY; JOHN SHOCKEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
04-2225-DKC)
Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 2, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Valdez, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United
States Attorney, James A. Frederick, Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Juan Valdez appeals the district court’s order denying
his Bivens * action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Valdez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-
04-2225-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.