Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-7391•Anthony Andrews v. JAMES C. FOX, District Judge
05-7391Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.04.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7391
ANTHONY ANDREWS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES C. FOX, District Judge; MS. LIBBY, Staff
Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-04-247-5-H)
Submitted: March 13, 2006 Decided: April 7, 2006
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Andrews, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Andrews appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motions for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) and 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for abeyance as
moot, deny the motion to recuse, and affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Andrews v. Fox, No. CA-04-247-5-H (E.D.N.C.
filed July 11, 2005 & entered July 14, 2005; filed Oct. 7, 2005 &
entered Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.