Anthony Andrews v. Kimberly A. Moore

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7289
ANTHONY ANDREWS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KIMBERLY A. MOORE; WINNIE JORDAN REAVES,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JOHN ASHCROFT; FRANK D. WHITNEY; ROBERT BOBBY
HIGDON, JR.; JOHN STUART BRUCE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-04-174)
Submitted: January 18, 2006 Decided: March 2, 2006
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Andrews appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), action and his motions
for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Andrews v. Moore, No. CA-04-174 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2005 & June 28,
2005). We deny the motions for abeyance and motion to recuse. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --