Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-7051•United States of America v. Jerry Howard Surratt, Jr
05-7051Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.03.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JERRY HOWARD SURRATT, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CR-03-108)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Howard Surratt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny,
Felice McConnell Corpening, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Howard Surratt, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s prior order
denying Surratt’s application for a writ of corum nobis pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Surratt v. United States, 5:03-CR-108-1-BO (E.D.N.C. May 18, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.