Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-7020•Anthony Burnside v. Warden William M. White
05-7020Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.10.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7020
ANTHONY BURNSIDE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN WILLIAM M. WHITE; ASSOCIATE WARDEN R.
REED; CAPTAIN D. BECKWITH; LIEUTENANT
RODERICK; SARGEANT F. THOMAS; SARGEANT S.
TOLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-04-22609-6)
Submitted: October 18, 2005 Decided: October 25, 2005
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Bernard Burnside, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana,
Jr., John Eric Kaufmann, MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Burnside, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Burnside v. White, No. CA-04-22609-6 (D.S.C.
June 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.