Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-6762•United States of America v. Jennell, No. CR-02-32 W.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2005 . We grant the motion to proceed
05-6762Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.07.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6762
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
VINCENT JENNELL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CR-02-32)
Submitted: July 14, 2005 Decided: July 27, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Jennell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, John
Leslie Brownlee, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Jennell, Jr., appeals the district court order
denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the
reasons of the district court. See United States v. Jennell, No.
CR-02-32 (W.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2005). We grant the motion to proceed
on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.