Harold Smith v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . - 2 - PER…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6473
HAROLD SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STEVE ASSOCIATE WARDEN; FRANK SPOON, Factory
Manager; JERRY DEMPSEY, Foreman; FNU MONROE,
Foreman; RICKY GAULT, Foreman; ELMORE BUTCH
HARRIS, Assistant Safety Manager; JOHN DOE,
Property Owner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(CA-04-1188-HFF)
Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 4, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Harold Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on the claims as to some, but not all, defendants in
Smith’s Bivens * action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.
R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.
541 (1949). The order Smith seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --