Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-6120•Anthony Leon Hoover v. WILLIAM T. SCHATZMAN, Head Sheriff
05-6120Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.05.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6120
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM T. SCHATZMAN, Head Sheriff; WAYNE
JAMES, Mayor; JANIET SIPE, Sgt.; KANJENNER
WILKS, Head Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-04-863)
Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 18, 2005
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Leon Hoover seeks to appeal the district court’s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing
his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the
district court. See Hoover v. Schatzman, No. CA-04-863 (M.D.N.C.
Jan. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.