Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-6032•Jimmy Locklear v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner
05-6032Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.07.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6032
JIMMY LOCKLEAR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-04-802-5-H)
Submitted: June 22, 2005 Decided: July 25, 2005
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Locklear, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the
district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. We have reviewed the record and have found no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-802-5-H
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.