Fernando Baltazar Muniz v. Fairfax County, Va

05-2424Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.06.2006

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2424
FERNANDO BALTAZAR MUNIZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-05-1067)
Submitted: June 9, 2006 Decided: June 22, 2006
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fernando Baltazar Muniz, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Lee Gibbons,
COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Fernando Baltazar Muniz appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his civil action brought pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and state law. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Muniz’s
petition for hearing en banc and affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Muniz v. Fairfax County, No. CA-05-1067 (E.D.
Va. filed Nov. 14, 2005 & entered Nov. 16, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.