Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-2360•In re: John Paul Turner, a/k/a Pops, CPO, United States Navy, Retired
05-2360Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.04.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2360
In Re: JOHN PAUL TURNER, a/k/a Pops, CPO,
United States Navy, Retired,
Plaintiff - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (CA-05-56-SGW)
Submitted: March 17, 2006 Decided: April 3, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismissing the action and denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny the motions for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and to consolidate and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See In re: Turner, No. CA-05-56-SGW (W.D.
Va. Nov. 15, 2005; Nov. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.