Emory Johnson, Jr v. Aluminum Company of America

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2353
EMORY JOHNSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (1:03-cv-00980-NCT)
Submitted: August 11, 2006 Decided: October 12, 2006
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emory Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Louis Adams Bledsoe, III,
Angelique Regail Vincent, ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA,
Charlotte, North Carolina; William Vance Conley, Lisa L. Steele,
LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE & MACRAE, LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for
Appellee
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Emory Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary
judgment in this employment discrimination and retaliation action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Johnson v. Aluminum Co. of America, No. 1:03-cv-00980-NCT
(M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --