Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-2335•Earl T. Scroggins, Jr v. Linda M. Scroggins
05-2335Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.05.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2335
EARL T. SCROGGINS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LINDA M. SCROGGINS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-05-980-1)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil action for failure to state claim on
which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Scroggins v. Scroggins, No. CA-
05-980-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2005). We deny Scroggins’ motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.