Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-2318•Dwight C. Brown v. Triton Security
05-2318Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.03.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2318
DWIGHT C. BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TRITON SECURITY; MIKE FINGERHUT; JOY APPLEBY,
Vice President,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-1544-1)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwight C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Abbey Gail Hairston, Jessica
Regan Hughes, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dwight C. Brown appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v.
Triton Security, No. CA-04-1544-1 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19, 2005 &
entered Oct. 21, 2005). We grant Appellees’ motion to strike
Brown’s reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.