Alexis B. Castillo Najera v. Ashcroft, 341 F.3d 218, 222 3d Cir. 2003 . We further find no merit to Najera’s…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2260
ALEXIS B. CASTILLO NAJERA,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General; UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A96-446-367)
Submitted: May 5, 2006 Decided: June 27, 2006
Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas A. Elliot, Thomas K. Ragland, ELLIOT & MAYOCK, Washington,
D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney
General, Donald E. Keener, Deputy Director, Alison Marie Igoe,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Alexis B. Castillo Najera, a native and citizen of
Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) order finding him removable as a result of a state
conviction for possession of cocaine. Najera contends the charge
to which he pled guilty is not a conviction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1101(a)(48)(A)(2000). He further contends it is a violation of
his right to equal protection. We deny the petition for review.
We find there is no merit to Najera’s claim that the
prior conviction for drug possession should not be considered a
conviction for removability purposes. See Acosta v. Ashcroft, 341
F.3d 218, 222 (3d Cir. 2003). We further find no merit to Najera’s
equal protection claim.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --