Louise Redditt v. Patricia Wade

05-2130Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.05.2006

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2130
LOUISE REDDITT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
DOMINIQUE HOLLIS, Louise Redditt, legal
guardian; DENEISHA HOLLIS, Louise Redditt,
legal guardian,
Plaintiffs,
versus
PATRICIA WADE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-1275-1)
Submitted: April 12, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louise Redditt, Appellant Pro Se.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Louise Redditt appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) against
Defendant Patricia Wade for failure to effect service within 120
days from the filing of the complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Redditt v. Wade, No.
CA-02-1275-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 23, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.